
A federal judge granted Bybit expedited discovery and a partial injunction to recover $1.5B in stolen crypto. $48.4M recovered, $30.5M frozen. Next steps focus on identifying intermediaries.
A federal judge in Washington granted expedited discovery and partially approved a preliminary injunction in Bybit's lawsuit to recover about $1.5 billion in assets stolen in the February 2025 hack. The orders allow the exchange to seek account records from platforms with U.S. operations and to freeze certain traceable funds while the case proceeds.
Bybit filed the complaint under seal on June 18 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The defendants include North Korea, its Reconnaissance General Bureau, the Lazarus Group, and 20 unidentified John Doe entities. Judge John D. Bates granted expedited discovery the next day and issued a temporary restraining order to stop movement of some assets. The TRO was renewed on July 16. On July 30, Bates granted the preliminary injunction in part, preserving identified assets. Bybit said the court found that "Bybit has demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits." That finding is interim, not a final ruling.
In its Aug. 7 update, Bybit said it has recovered roughly $48.4 million of the stolen funds. Another $30.5 million remains frozen across more than 28 exchanges and custodians, though that money has not yet been returned. Combined, about $78.9 million falls into the recovered or frozen category.
The exchange's June filing painted a more difficult picture. Ninety point two percent of the stolen assets had become untraceable after moving through mixers, cross-chain bridges and over-the-counter dealers. Only 9.8 percent remained connected to identifiable wallets at that point. About 5.3 percent of the original theft, roughly $75.5 million, had been frozen or recovered by then.
The latest separation of recovered and frozen amounts shows the gap widening. In March, CEO Ben Zhou said 88.87% of stolen funds could still be traced, 7.59% had gone dark and 3.54% had been frozen. The June filing reflected how laundering continued to obscure the trail.
The FBI attributed the attack to North Korea on Feb. 26, five days after the theft. The agency tracks the activity as "TraderTraitor." It said the attackers converted some stolen assets into Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, dispersing them across thousands of addresses on multiple blockchains. The FBI urged exchanges and service providers to block transactions linked to addresses it identified. Bybit says its civil lawsuit remains separate from U.S. criminal investigations and that it continues sharing intelligence with the FBI.
Forensic investigators traced the breach to compromised infrastructure connected to Safe Wallet. A compromised Safe developer machine allowed the attackers to propose a disguised malicious transaction, according to earlier reports. Safe later said it found no vulnerability in its smart contracts or source code and rebuilt infrastructure after the incident.
Bybit launched a bounty program soon after the hack. The federal lawsuit adds discovery and injunction tools to that recovery strategy. The exchange can now seek offchain records like customer identities and transaction histories from platforms that may have processed stolen funds.
The complaint seeks return of the stolen assets and treble damages under RICO, according to unsealed court records. Those remain claims for relief, not a final judgment.
Bybit also credited international cooperation for earlier progress. German authorities took action against eXch and coordinated with Swiss counterparts to disrupt Cryptomixer.io, services Bybit said were used to move illicit proceeds. Those actions are separate from the Washington case.
The next stage centers on discovery and enforcement. Bybit can request records from relevant service providers while the preliminary injunction restricts movement of certain identified assets. Whether additional recovery occurs depends on connecting wallets to identifiable account holders and reaching assets held by entities subject to enforceable court orders.
The court orders give Bybit a stronger legal route. They do not guarantee further recovery. Responses to discovery requests and attempts to identify the John Doe defendants remain the next steps. Bybit said it intends to seek further judicial relief as the case develops.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.