UAE regulators investigate Bybit freezes after 14,000 USDT locked 20 days. How custodial risk reshapes exchange choice and what to watch next.
Alpha Score of 25 reflects poor overall profile with poor momentum, poor value, strong quality. Based on 3 of 4 signals – score is capped at 90 until remaining data ingests.
Account freezes lasting more than 20 days without explanation have drawn a line from user complaints to regulator involvement. The incidents put Bybit's compliance practices under direct scrutiny in the UAE, where the crypto licensing framework is still being built out. For traders on the exchange, the effective liquidity of any balance dropped to zero during those freeze windows.
Starting around May 1, 2026, multiple users reported their Bybit accounts frozen with no stated reason, no resolution timeline, and minimal responses from customer support. The complaints appeared across Reddit, Trustpilot, and crypto community forums. The common thread was consistent: accounts locked under the umbrella of “compliance checks,” followed by radio silence.
A Binance Square post dated May 15 identified Bybit account freezes as one of the most significant user concerns of the year. The post aggregated multiple reports, giving the issue a broader audience and drawing attention from competing exchanges.
Historical complaints suggest this is not a single anomaly. Similar prolonged freezes were reported throughout 2025, with users describing the same lack of transparency. In one prominent case from the current wave, roughly 14,000 USDT sat locked for over 20 days before the funds were finally released. The account was then permanently closed. The freeze was only lifted after the user escalated publicly and UAE regulators became involved.
Bybit’s stated reason for the freezes is “compliance checks.” That umbrella term covers anti-money-laundering reviews, know-your-customer verification, and sanctions screening. The problem is not the checks themselves. The problem is the radio silence that follows.
Exchanges freeze accounts when automated or manual screening flags a transaction pattern, a wallet address, or a geographic IP. A freeze without a timeline creates liquidity risk for the user and reputational risk for the exchange. Bybit’s support team has not provided estimated resolution windows. Users are left guessing whether their funds are caught in a routine review or a permanent lock. That ambiguity drives public escalation.
Practical rule: A freeze with no timeline is a custodial blackout. The user’s effective liquidity is zero until the exchange decides otherwise.
In February 2025, Bybit suffered a significant hack that shook user confidence in the Dubai-based exchange. In response, Bybit tightened its compliance and security protocols. Tighter protocols typically increase false positives. The current freeze wave may be a downstream effect of that tightening – automated systems flagging more users without adequate manual review capacity.
The UAE has been actively building out its crypto regulatory framework through bodies such as the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) in Dubai. Incidents like these put exchange compliance practices under a microscope. If UAE regulators determine that Bybit’s freeze procedures do not meet local consumer protection standards, the exchange could face operational restrictions or additional oversight requirements.
Regulator attention is the single most concrete catalyst. The 14,000 USDT case reached regulators because the user went public. That creates a paper trail. A formal complaint could trigger an inquiry into whether Bybit’s freeze-and-silence pattern violates the UAE’s evolving rules on fair treatment of retail customers.
Worst case for Bybit: a regulator mandate to either reform freeze procedures or face license restrictions. The exchange’s Dubai headquarters puts it in a jurisdiction that wants to attract crypto business but also wants to avoid reputational damage. A high-profile freeze dispute could tip the balance toward tighter enforcement.
Competitors are already using Bybit’s troubles as promotional material. Several exchanges have positioned themselves as safer, more transparent alternatives.
This thesis stands on three pillars: user complaints, regulator involvement, and competitor positioning. Each pillar has a confirmation signal and a weakening signal.
Confirming signals:
Weakening signals:
For traders evaluating exchange risk, the Bybit freeze wave is a reminder that custodial control matters as much as fee schedules. Watch for a Bybit blog post or support page update that addresses freeze timelines. The absence of such a post within the next two weeks is a confirmation signal. The presence of one is a weakening signal – only if the timelines are concrete and enforced.
For related coverage on exchange risk and crypto market structure, see our crypto market analysis and reviews of the best crypto brokers. The Bybit situation also connects to broader compliance themes discussed in our coverage of Binance Philippines re-entry and TrapDoor package risks.
Prepared with AlphaScala research tooling and grounded in primary market data: live prices, fundamentals, SEC filings, hedge-fund holdings, and insider activity. Each story is checked against AlphaScala publishing rules before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.