
Brazil's crypto industry pushes back against a bill that would classify stablecoins as electronic money. A public hearing with the central bank could decide the fate of the $6.8B market.
Brazil's stablecoin market, worth $6.8 billion in monthly purchases, faces a regulatory fork. A public hearing this week will debate whether stablecoins should be classified as electronic money or remain digital assets. The outcome could reshape how exchanges, issuers, and users operate in the country's largest crypto market.
Bill 4308/2024, introduced by Deputy Aureo Ribeiro, aims to regulate stablecoin issuance and use. Rapporteur Jadyel Alencar requested the hearing, which will include a representative from the central bank and one from Abcripto, the main crypto industry association. Abcripto wants stablecoins to stay under central bank oversight but keep their digital asset classification.
Stablecoin issuers do not manage user funds like electronic money institutions, the association argues. They only issue and destroy tokens in creation-redemption processes. That differs from electronic money, which Brazil already regulates under Bill 12.865/2013. Reclassifying stablecoins as electronic money would introduce uncertainty and regulatory conflicts, Abcripto said in a technical note.
Julia Rosin, President of Abcripto, stressed that this is an opportunity for Brazil to align with global digital economy trends and avoid the pitfalls that jurisdictions that have chosen to classify stablecoins as electronic money, like the European Union, face.
“Our contribution seeks to offer technical support for the improvement of the project, preserving legal certainty, innovation, and Brazil’s ability to compete in an increasingly internationalized market, without compromising user protection and adequate regulatory oversight,” she declared.
Central Bank data shows stablecoins dominate Brazil's crypto flows. Of $6.9 billion in total crypto purchases, $6.8 billion were stablecoins. That makes the classification decision high stakes for traders who rely on USDT, USDC, and similar tokens for on and off ramps.
If lawmakers classify stablecoins as electronic money, issuers would need to follow a different rulebook. They might require banking or e-money licenses, which could push out smaller players, raise costs, and reduce liquidity. For traders, that means potential disruption to trading pairs and withdrawal options.
A decision to keep stablecoins as digital assets, with central bank oversight but no reclassification, would reduce that risk. Abcripto has already shown it will fight hard: in January, it threatened to sue the federal government if it tried to tax stablecoins by decree.
The hearing date has not been announced. The bill still needs to move through committee and a floor vote.
Prepared with AlphaScala research tooling and grounded in primary market data: live prices, fundamentals, SEC filings, hedge-fund holdings, and insider activity. Each story is checked against AlphaScala publishing rules before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.