
The BIS warns dollar-backed stablecoins bypass capital controls in emerging markets, creating new challenges for central banks managing currency demand. The study covers 130+ economies.
The Bank for International Settlements has warned that dollar-pegged stablecoins are increasingly bypassing traditional capital controls, a finding that complicates monetary management for emerging-market central banks already struggling with dollarization.
In a working paper covering more than 130 economies, BIS researchers compared conventional foreign-currency deposits with cross-border stablecoin inflows. They concluded the two share similar macroeconomic drivers but respond in opposite ways to government restrictions. Stablecoin adoption rises during exchange-rate volatility and banking crises, the paper found. Traditional dollar deposits also rise in those periods. They remain subject to capital controls and foreign-exchange rules. Stablecoin flows do not.
The reason, the researchers said, is the decentralized nature of public blockchains. Transfers happen outside the regulatory channels that monitor banks and cross-border payments. That means existing policy tools designed to limit foreign-currency outflows are less effective when applied to blockchain-based assets.
"Regulating stablecoin issuers alone may not be enough," the BIS paper said. Even when issuers operate under strict rules, the underlying tokens can continue moving across public blockchains beyond the reach of capital controls.
The study also found little evidence that stablecoins simply replace existing dollar bank deposits. Instead, they create an additional channel for households and businesses to gain dollar exposure, particularly in emerging markets where local currencies face persistent inflation or repeated financial instability.
Banking crises are more closely associated with rising stablecoin adoption than with traditional deposit dollarization, the BIS researchers said. That reflects the appeal of assets that operate outside the banking sector during periods of stress.
The paper aligns with recent assessments from the International Monetary Fund, which has warned that stablecoins can lower payment costs and improve access to dollar liquidity. Widespread adoption may reduce demand for local currencies and complicate monetary policy in economies already vulnerable to dollarization, the IMF said.
The stablecoin market has grown to more than $320 billion, according to the BIS. The tokens are increasingly used for cross-border payments and settlement, not just cryptocurrency trading.
Policymakers are responding. The European Union has begun implementing its Markets in Crypto-Assets framework. In the United States, lawmakers have advanced legislation setting reserve and licensing requirements for dollar-backed stablecoin issuers.
The BIS paper suggests none of these efforts fully address the macroeconomic implications. The underlying tokens can still move across public blockchains, and the BIS found that both conventional dollarization and stablecoin adoption show strong persistence once established. Even temporary crises can leave a lasting footprint on currency demand.
Moderate dollarization has been associated with somewhat higher inflation risks, the BIS found. The evidence that it significantly weakens monetary policy transmission is limited. The primary challenge, the researchers said, is maintaining control over currency demand rather than the central bank's ability to set interest rates.
For emerging markets, the implication is that digital dollarization follows different dynamics than the conventional banking system. Capital controls that work on bank deposits may not work on stablecoins. Central banks may need to rethink their approach to foreign-exchange management, the BIS argued.
The stablecoin market now exceeds $320 billion, the BIS said. The paper offers the most detailed cross-country evidence to date on how digital dollarization differs from the conventional banking system.
Read more: crypto market analysis
Prepared with AlphaScala editorial tooling from the source reporting linked above. Indexable analysis may include a cited Alpha Score value. Publishing checks screen each story before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.