
BIS Working Paper No. 1335 uses Token Terminal fee data to show Ethereum and Solana each generated $500M-$600M in annual fees by late 2025. The research finds users migrate to lower-cost chains, challenging moats.
The Bank for International Settlements is now citing Token Terminal data in its published research on crypto markets. BIS Working Paper No. 1335, released in March 2026, references the platform's fee revenue estimates for major Layer 1 networks.
By late 2025, Ethereum and Solana each generated annualized fee revenues in the range of $500 million to $600 million, according to the data. Tron fell in a similar range. Token Terminal tracks standardized metrics across more than 100 chains, covering fees and revenue in a format comparable across networks. Another BIS bulletin on blockchain consensus and fragmentation also uses the platform's figures alongside DeFiLlama data.
The working paper frames the fee structure as a fragmentation problem. When fees spike on one chain, users tend to move to lower-cost alternatives. This dynamic spreads liquidity and activity across dozens of competing chains, each with its own fee model and security design. The network effects that concentrate activity in traditional finance do not carry over to crypto.
For holders of major Layer 1 tokens, the finding challenges the assumption that dominant chains keep wide moats. Ethereum currently collects more annual fees than its rivals. The BIS data shows users vote with their feet on cost. A chain generating $500 million today could see that figure erode if a faster, cheaper competitor emerges.
The BIS publications incorporate Token Terminal data as routine research methodology. There are no direct quotes from BIS officials endorsing crypto or calling blockchain a systemic priority. Still, the institution's willingness to treat onchain metrics as credible inputs marks a shift in how central banks approach crypto markets.
The $500 million to $600 million fee range for each of the top networks represents real economic activity – actual users paying actual transaction costs – not speculative token values. That base of real use provides a floor. The BIS fragmentation research highlights the risk that those flows are not sticky.
Prepared with AlphaScala research tooling and grounded in primary market data: live prices, fundamentals, SEC filings, hedge-fund holdings, and insider activity. Each story is checked against AlphaScala publishing rules before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.