
Bank of Italy researchers ran 200 USDC transfers across ten corridors. Fiat conversion costs, not blockchain fees, drove the 0.3% to 9% range. Stablecoins beat the World Bank average but lost to Wise in most cases.
A new study from the Bank of Italy is challenging the idea that stablecoins automatically make cross-border payments cheaper or faster. The central bank's researchers ran 200 transfers using USDC across ten payment corridors linking Italy to Brazil, Argentina, Japan, the United Arab Emirates, and South Africa. Their finding: the biggest cost driver isn't the blockchain fee. It is the fiat on-ramp and off-ramp.
Total costs for stablecoin transfers ranged from 0.3% to nearly 9% depending on the destination. The spread came almost entirely from currency conversion and local infrastructure, not from the digital dollar layer itself. Researchers said blockchain-related fees accounted for only a small slice of the total expense. That nuance matters for an industry that often pitches stablecoins as a friction-killer for international payments.
The study compared stablecoin costs against two benchmarks: the World Bank's global average of 6.65% for cross-border remittances, and the rates charged by Wise. On the World Bank measure, stablecoins often came in cheaper. Against Wise, the picture flipped. Stablecoins beat Wise in only three of the seven comparable corridors. The result suggests savings depend heavily on the specific market pair, not on the technology choice.
Speed followed the same pattern. When the receiving country had an instant payment system, stablecoin settlements cleared in under 20 minutes. In countries without that infrastructure, payments took one to two business days. The bottleneck was the national payment network, not the blockchain.
The researchers argued that the biggest gain would come if users could spend stablecoins directly in the real economy – on rent, tuition, or daily purchases – without converting back to local fiat. That would eliminate the conversion costs that currently dominate the fee structure. That scenario depends on merchant adoption of digital asset payments, which remains limited.
Regulation got its own section. The study said prohibitionist approaches have not reduced demand for stablecoins. Instead, they pushed users toward offshore platforms and unregulated circuits. Very restrictive frameworks also made operations more complex for individuals without stopping the flows.
The paper lands as multiple jurisdictions tighten their rules. The European Union's MiCA framework is now in force. The U.S. passed the GENIUS law for payment stablecoins. Both could reshape how stablecoins operate in cross-border contexts.
According to DefiLlama, the stablecoin market now sits at roughly $307 billion, up about 16% year-over-year. The Bank of Italy study suggests that growth alone will not solve the cost problem. The real work is on fiat conversion rails, payment network upgrades, and regulatory regimes that allow stablecoins to circulate without a mandatory round-trip to the banking system.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.