
134 bank leaders warn stablecoin rewards could drain hundreds of billions in deposits from community lenders, urging the Senate to close the CLARITY Act's incentive loophole before final passage.
A coalition of 134 bank leaders and state banking association officers is pushing the Senate to rewrite the CLARITY Act's stablecoin incentive rules before the bill becomes law. Their letter, addressed to Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) and Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), targets Section 10404 of the legislation.
That section currently restricts paying interest or yield on payment stablecoins. The bankers want it strengthened so companies cannot bypass the prohibition through rewards, incentives, or other arrangements that create similar economic benefits for holding stablecoins.
“We therefore urge the Senate to incorporate the targeted Section 10404 changes recommended by our state bankers associations before final passage,” the group wrote.
The warning centers on deposit funding. Banks argue that stablecoin products offering holding-based rewards could pull deposits away from community lenders, reducing the pool of money available for mortgages, small business loans, and agricultural credit.
“If stablecoin products are permitted to attract and retain balances through interest-like rewards or other holding-based incentives, the local funding base that supports this lending could be weakened by hundreds of billions,” the letter said.
The signatories said clear rules would allow payment stablecoins to develop while preserving the funding channels that support community lending. They argued that incentives tied to balances, holding periods, or account duration could replicate features of interest-bearing products, creating the need for clearer boundaries in the CLARITY Act.
The debate highlights a broader disagreement over the future role of stablecoins in financial markets. Bankers argue payment stablecoins should remain focused on transactions rather than become products designed to attract long-term holdings.
The issue has also emerged in discussions surrounding the bill’s treatment of stablecoin incentives, with the CLARITY Act stablecoin rewards debate highlighting disagreements over how regulators should define prohibited yield arrangements.
The banking industry has previously raised stablecoin yield concerns as digital asset companies and policymakers examine how rewards, incentives, and reserve structures could affect competition with traditional financial institutions.
The Senate’s final language on stablecoins will define how payment-focused digital assets operate within the broader U.S. financial system. Stand With Crypto has said it will score senators' votes on the bill, giving its 3 million U.S. advocates a public record of lawmaker positions on digital asset policy.
The push follows broader industry concerns about stablecoin deposit risks as financial institutions evaluate how digital assets may compete with traditional banking products.
Thune and Schumer will determine the Senate's final language on stablecoins, defining how payment-focused digital assets operate alongside insured deposits.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.